create an organisation, which may be called --- bharat suraksha sangathan, in which all youths in the age group of 17 to 37 can be enrolled on optional basis, for week end training in self defence, civil defence and environment defence. all youth organisations, like NCC, scouts, nehru yuva kendra, etc, under various ministries, should be subsumed into it. if any youth wants to join government, for him make it compulsory. this will instill values of service, patriotism in youth

VII. The Madras High Court totally failed to appreciate the Act of Consecration as defined in the Halsbury Laws of England, Book – XI at page 7 to 8 as follows : “ property which has been dedicated to God or to the Service of God, may be stamped with an ecclesiastical character in a real sense by an act recognized by the Law, which is called in act of consecration…” A Church “ or Chapel may be erected before consecration of the ground, and may with the consent of the Bishop be used for

It is respectfully submitted that a perusal of Exhibit B 16 would establish that one Mr. Augustine Pereira, a missionary priest of Diocese of Trichinopoly, erected Stations of Cross with all prescribed conditions and ceremonies in the Church of St. Mary Magdalene. Thus, the Church of St. Mary Magdalene was already in existence as on 9-3-1902. Further, installation/erection of Stations of Cross is only a Divine Act of worship under the Canon Law. Stations of Cross is nothing but images /p

Popularizing Yoga and Meditation, Proper centers for Yoga in a city, Art of Living Programs

4. That on 19-10-2012 the petitioner filed Special Leave Petition(C ) No.5690. 5. That on the petitioner is preferring review petition against the order dated 15.02.2013 passed by this Hon’ble Court [Comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K.Prasad and Hon’ble Mr. Justice F.M.I.Kalifulla ) in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5690 of 2013 on the following amongst other grounds: GROUNDS I. The core issue of the Review Petition is that the Civil Law of the Land shall prevail and override any perso

3.9. That on 15.7.1998 the first appellate court reversed the judgment of the Trial Court and dismissed the suit allowing the Canon Law to be introduced by the Appellant overriding secular rights of Plaintiffs. 3.10. That in the year 1998 the plaintiffs preferred LPA No.80 of 1998. 3.11. That on 29-04-2003 the High Court dismissed LPA No.80 of 1998allowing the Canon Law overriding secular rights of Plaintiffs. . 3.12. That in the year 2003 Special Leave Petition was filed in SLP C N

TO, THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:- 1. The present Review Petition Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 15.02.2013 passed by this Hon’ble Court [Comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K. Prasad and Hon’ble justice F.M.I. Kalifulla] in Special Leave Petition (C) NO. 5690 of 2013, whereby the Hon’ble Court dismissed the

As an example the following matter is submitted for consideration. IN THE MATTER OF: 1. A.S.Arockiaraj R/o Vakkampatti Village, DindigulTaluk, Tamil Nadu ....Petitioner -Versus- 1. M.Kanagappan S/o Mariasanthanam R/o Main Road, Vakampatti (Via) N Panchampatti in DindigulTaluk Tamil Nadu. 2. Parish Priest of St. Sacred Heart Church, N.PanchampattiDindigul Taluk, Tamil Nadu 3. Parish Priest of St. Jopseph Church, Main Road, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu 4. The A

able P.M of India, Honor We request you to go through the attachment about cannon LAW, Is it applicable in our country ? Kindly take up this matter to APEX constitutional bench and get the render justice. Pl help in this regards for justice. Regards. R.JABIN-9444170549

Brief Description of serious Constituitional issue to be addressed by the constitution Bench of Hon. The supreme court of India. The Canon law was framed by British/Western countries for the various Christian denominations/groups for theological or ecclesiastical implications to the inter group partiesconcerned like Roman Catholics, protestants etc.,. It is not a statutory law in secular India and have neither has overriding powers over in Indian Law of the land and if allowed it has serious imp