Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting suggestions on the Draft Vision document for Phase III of eCourts Project

Start Date :
Apr 08, 2021
Last Date :
May 31, 2021
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of ...

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian Judiciary-2005". It is the mission mode project carried out by the Department of Justice.

The e-Committee has evolved in terms of its roles and responsibilities over the last fifteen years. The objectives of the e-Committee include:
The Interlinking of all courts across the country.
ICT enablement of the Indian judicial system.
Enhancing judicial productivity.
Making the justice delivery system accessible, cost-effective, transparent, and accountable.
Providing citizen-centric services.

As Phase-II will soon conclude, the draft vision document for Phase III is prepared. This draft Vision Document outlines an inclusive, agile, open, and user-centric vision for courts in Phase III of the e-Courts Project.

Phase III envisions digital courts that deliver justice as a service to all, beyond simply replicating offline processes digitally. The use of technology in the judiciary is therefore guided by two facets central to Gandhian thought—access and inclusion. In addition, the core values of trust, empathy, sustainability, and transparency provide the guardrails for achieving the founding vision.

Building over the advancements made in Phases I & II of the project, this document articulates the need to exponentially advance the digitization of courts by (a) simplifying procedures, (b) creating a digital infrastructure, and the (c) establishment of the right institutional and governance framework, such as technology offices at various levels to enable the judiciary to appropriately employ technology. It articulates key goals for putting in place the digital infrastructure and services for Phase III.

This vision document envisions a platform architecture for technology that will enable diverse digital services to further evolve over time at scale. It also is designed to take an ecosystem approach that leverages the existing capacities in different stakeholders such as civil society leaders, universities, practitioners, and technologists to realise this future.

The e-Committee, Supreme Court of India has called for comments, suggestions, and inputs on the draft vision document for its 3rd phase of the e-Courts Project from all its stakeholders to refine and plan the implementation of the next phase of the e-Courts Project.

Click here to read the Draft Vision Document.

The last date to receive inputs is 31st May 2021.

Reset
Showing 1705 Submission(s)
lingaraj mishra
lingaraj mishra 5 years 3 months ago
give more power to district judge and open different court at district level so also high court should be run by v.c in district level.
Sujit Kumar_8
Sujit Kumar_8 5 years 3 months ago
Sir, People need transperency, all court proceeding should be on camera recording which can be made available to concerned if asked with minimum payments. without camera recording no court should be allowed to function. It will make judgement strong, corruption less, Accountability. Judges will also fear that they are under recording. petitioner or client can take this recording and shows to upper court that decision was baised and to review it. Courts & Advocates fee should be minimum.
Arpit Gawande
Arpit Gawande 5 years 3 months ago
Thanks for asking comments. The goal of this phase are somewhat vague. The goals should be measurable. It needs to be define what thing are we going to implement for below goals to achieve and how will we measure achievement? • Enhancing judicial productivity. • Making the justice delivery system accessible, cost-effective, transparent, and accountable. • Providing citizen-centric services.
Pramod kumar jena
Pramod kumar jena 5 years 3 months ago
Dear pm, as u stated we should know our past to solve any future mastery so obvious about our justice system. we put a institution known as UPSC for presidential oath seeking executives to run the business of country.2nd- we make transfer of power through legislation by casting our votes when required or once in five yrs.3- but after independence we did not decide about our judiciaries how and which way they r to be inducted in the system.no clarity defined so that like father like son goes in.
TRISHA CHAKRABORTY
TRISHA CHAKRABORTY 5 years 3 months ago
One of My Personal Favorite Justice and A Role Model Y.Chandrachud Already gave us the Vision of Digitalisation of the court in 2020 with the pandamic.Now it is more updated and the citizens are super excited to get the benefits out of these applications.aindeed useful.I congratulate Our Prime Minister as well.Nothing can be better than Judiciary of India working so effectively maintaining the dignity and protocols given.True and sincere thanks and best wishes,It will be pleasantly effective.
shubhangi nayak
shubhangi nayak 5 years 3 months ago
हमारे देश की सबसे बड़ी समस्या हैं समाज का डर, जिस वजह से हजारों लोग अन्याय के खिलाफ आवाज नहीं उठा पाते।सबसे पहले पब्लिक अवरेनेस इस विषय में फैलाना जरूरी है। दूसरा ई कोर्ट की वजह से निर्णय जल्दी हो केस के यह बहुत जरूरी है क्यंकि सालों तक सही होने पर भी कोर्ट में पिसना बहुत दुखद हैं।इंसान की पूरी उम्र कोर्ट में ही निकल जाती।
Bipin Mehta
Bipin Mehta 5 years 3 months ago
Respected Sirs, This is regarding popularising Legal Aid Committee Cells and legal counseling cells in each taluka, district, and high courts, This will be helpful to poor litigants.
P V Ananthachari
P V Ananthachari 5 years 3 months ago
e courts certainly wipe out bribes, good in a way. Time of delivery of judgement can't b imposed on courts since time of release has to b visualised by judges. Human trafficking at normal courts influences judges. Political parties want quota system in judges is a failure for them. Political quota judges will increase crimes by releasing criminals of their party and unwanted misjudgement over political vendetta, here e courts nullify such acts. There r many pros and cons, here i cant enumerate.