Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting suggestions on the Draft Vision document for Phase III of eCourts Project

Start Date :
Apr 08, 2021
Last Date :
May 31, 2021
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of ...

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian Judiciary-2005". It is the mission mode project carried out by the Department of Justice.

The e-Committee has evolved in terms of its roles and responsibilities over the last fifteen years. The objectives of the e-Committee include:
The Interlinking of all courts across the country.
ICT enablement of the Indian judicial system.
Enhancing judicial productivity.
Making the justice delivery system accessible, cost-effective, transparent, and accountable.
Providing citizen-centric services.

As Phase-II will soon conclude, the draft vision document for Phase III is prepared. This draft Vision Document outlines an inclusive, agile, open, and user-centric vision for courts in Phase III of the e-Courts Project.

Phase III envisions digital courts that deliver justice as a service to all, beyond simply replicating offline processes digitally. The use of technology in the judiciary is therefore guided by two facets central to Gandhian thought—access and inclusion. In addition, the core values of trust, empathy, sustainability, and transparency provide the guardrails for achieving the founding vision.

Building over the advancements made in Phases I & II of the project, this document articulates the need to exponentially advance the digitization of courts by (a) simplifying procedures, (b) creating a digital infrastructure, and the (c) establishment of the right institutional and governance framework, such as technology offices at various levels to enable the judiciary to appropriately employ technology. It articulates key goals for putting in place the digital infrastructure and services for Phase III.

This vision document envisions a platform architecture for technology that will enable diverse digital services to further evolve over time at scale. It also is designed to take an ecosystem approach that leverages the existing capacities in different stakeholders such as civil society leaders, universities, practitioners, and technologists to realise this future.

The e-Committee, Supreme Court of India has called for comments, suggestions, and inputs on the draft vision document for its 3rd phase of the e-Courts Project from all its stakeholders to refine and plan the implementation of the next phase of the e-Courts Project.

Click here to read the Draft Vision Document.

The last date to receive inputs is 31st May 2021.

Reset
Showing 1705 Submission(s)
ARUN KUMAR GUPTA
ARUN KUMAR GUPTA 5 years 3 months ago
It is not always courts where delay is caused. Lawyers find lacunae in laws to cause delay. Nirbhaya case example is well known where Supreme Court has ordered hanging, mercy petition rejected by President of India but still lawyers kept filing petitions on this ground or other for months. Even law minister had to express regret in matter. As it was a high profile case, culprits were hanged ultimately. But it exposed the weakness of systems. Can eCourts help in such cases?
Gangadhar Rachakonda
Gangadhar Rachakonda 5 years 3 months ago
Sir Now a days every person had I D proofs like Aadhar.etc.So instruction may be given to every citizen of India link their Mobile.number in it. Most of the courts cases are pending for want of issue of summons to parties.through post or bailiff from court process is going on now.it is causing more delay in issue of court notices. E.courts may be helpful to complete this process without any delay by sending messages to their mobile may be legalized as per evidence act.
Niranjan Meghani
Niranjan Meghani 5 years 3 months ago
सर कोरोना हे देश की न्यायपालिका को इसका लाभ लेना चाइए सालो से पेंडिंग केस हे केवल उन पर फैसला लेना हे अगर उन पर जजमेंट हो रेवेन्यू के केस बहुत लंबित रहते उन पर न्यायपालिका को समय सीमा तय होनी चाइए बलात्कार केस हो या मर्डर केस उन पर भी समय सीमा तय हो सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात की चेक के केस जब की डिजिटल हो गया हे उसमे सिस्टम बहुत दिमी गति हे उसके लिए 1 month मे फैसले होने चाइए देश की न्यायपालिका पर आज भी भरोसा हे जय हिंद
Ruturaj Takale
Ruturaj Takale 5 years 3 months ago
महोदय, प्रत्येक गांव में कई खेत जमीन के कोर्ट मामले सालो साल चलते है इसलिए असली किसान को और देश को बड़ा नुकसान झेलना पड़ता है। गरीब किसानो को कई एडवोकेट्स कोर्ट के चक्कर में लूटते है इसलिए ड्रोन के माध्यम से जमीन मापने का काम पूरे देश में चलाकर जमीनी दस्तावेज के हिसाब से किसानों को अपनी जमीन उपजाने का मौका दिया जाए। इसके बाद जो भी मामले बचेंगे उनका फास्ट्रैक कोर्ट के माध्यम से हल निकाला जाए। इससे गरीब किसान कोर्ट में पैसा बर्बाद होने से भी बच जायेंगे और अपनी हक की जमीन पर उत्पादन ले पाएंगे।
Anil Kumar Malhotra
Anil Kumar Malhotra 5 years 3 months ago
My view is to appoint more judges whether Retired on contract to hear all pending cases in Honble SC and High Courts in a time bound phase either through Digitization or otherwise so that everyone should get justice in their life. Mycase in Honble High Court of P&H pending since 1998 and have no hope to get judgement of that and other cases regarding Medical facilities and EPF Pension to Retired employees since 2012 being Retired. Rightly said Judgement delayed means judgement denied
TANTRAVAHI SREERAMACHANDRAMURTY
TANTRAVAHI SREERAMACHANDRAMURTY 5 years 3 months ago
Timeframeneeded for disposal of cases No adjournments allowed.Dont allow to proceed in higher courts .summer holidays not justified.cheqebounce cases can be entrusted to Banking ombudsman Police chalanas can be entrusted to AsP rank official.
charudatta deo
charudatta deo 5 years 3 months ago
Like I-Tax payer faceless problem solving online mechanism, this method must be adopted in judicial system with time limit period. Mainly in many criminal cases where many peoples undelebately blamed then fixed main accused or one responsibal person only should phijically present till court verdict.