Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting suggestions on the Draft Vision document for Phase III of eCourts Project

Start Date :
Apr 08, 2021
Last Date :
May 31, 2021
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of ...

The e-Committee of the Supreme Court has been overseeing the implementation of the e-Courts Project, conceptualized under the "National Policy and Action Plan for Implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indian Judiciary-2005". It is the mission mode project carried out by the Department of Justice.

The e-Committee has evolved in terms of its roles and responsibilities over the last fifteen years. The objectives of the e-Committee include:
The Interlinking of all courts across the country.
ICT enablement of the Indian judicial system.
Enhancing judicial productivity.
Making the justice delivery system accessible, cost-effective, transparent, and accountable.
Providing citizen-centric services.

As Phase-II will soon conclude, the draft vision document for Phase III is prepared. This draft Vision Document outlines an inclusive, agile, open, and user-centric vision for courts in Phase III of the e-Courts Project.

Phase III envisions digital courts that deliver justice as a service to all, beyond simply replicating offline processes digitally. The use of technology in the judiciary is therefore guided by two facets central to Gandhian thought—access and inclusion. In addition, the core values of trust, empathy, sustainability, and transparency provide the guardrails for achieving the founding vision.

Building over the advancements made in Phases I & II of the project, this document articulates the need to exponentially advance the digitization of courts by (a) simplifying procedures, (b) creating a digital infrastructure, and the (c) establishment of the right institutional and governance framework, such as technology offices at various levels to enable the judiciary to appropriately employ technology. It articulates key goals for putting in place the digital infrastructure and services for Phase III.

This vision document envisions a platform architecture for technology that will enable diverse digital services to further evolve over time at scale. It also is designed to take an ecosystem approach that leverages the existing capacities in different stakeholders such as civil society leaders, universities, practitioners, and technologists to realise this future.

The e-Committee, Supreme Court of India has called for comments, suggestions, and inputs on the draft vision document for its 3rd phase of the e-Courts Project from all its stakeholders to refine and plan the implementation of the next phase of the e-Courts Project.

Click here to read the Draft Vision Document.

The last date to receive inputs is 31st May 2021.

Reset
Showing 1705 Submission(s)
Mithilesh Singh
Mithilesh Singh 5 years 3 months ago
माननीय प्रधानमंत्री जी, गैर भाजपा शासित राज्यों का आरोप कि, केंद्र सरकार कोविड-१९ वैक्सीन देने में भेदभाव कर रही है, यह बहुत ही गंभीर आरोप है। इसका आधिकारिक रूप से प्रामाणिक आंकड़ों के साथ, प्रेसवार्ता के माध्यम से खंडन किया जाना चाहिए‌। यथा- * राज्यवार टीकों के कितने डोज दिए गए, * राज्यवार कितने टीके लगाए गए, * राज्यवार कितने टीके बर्बाद हुए, * बर्बाद टीकों से कितना राजस्व की हानि हुई, इत्यादि। मिथ्याक्षेप हो या आरोप में सच्चाई हो, दोनों ही स्थिति में सरकार की छवि धूमिल होती है।
jitesh kodwani
jitesh kodwani 5 years 3 months ago
माननीय सुप्रीम कोर्ट. सबसे पहले तो जो झूठे केस दर्ज किए जा रहे हैं उन्हें सही इन्वेस्टिगेशन की जरूरत है क्योंकि पुलिस अपनी मर्यादा का उल्लंघन कर निर्दोष व्यक्ति को फसा देती है और वह व्यक्ति कोर्ट के चक्कर काट काट कर खत्म हो जाता है या मर जाता है! 498A ओर उसके साथ जो धारा का खुलेआम दुरुपयोग हो रहा है इसका अंदाजा आप युवा वर्ग की मृत्यु दर से लगा सकते हैं जो कि शादी के बाद झूठे केस में 96000 युवा ने दम तोड़ा है! शर्मनाक है जिस देश की नीव युवा वर्ग पर टिकी हो वहां न्याय के लिए मरना पड़ता हो! 🙏
Mayank gupta
Mayank gupta 5 years 3 months ago
समिति के निर्णय काफी अच्छे है पर साथ ही कोर्ट की संख्या और न्यायधीश की संख्या में विचार भी ज़रूरी हो जाता है । २ ई कोर्ट के साथ कुछ मिनी कोर्ट भी दूरस्थ इलकाओ में स्थापित किए जाए ताकि न्याय दूर तक पहुंच सके और जनता ही न्याय ना करे । ३ कानून के भाषा सरल हो। ४ जिला आदालतों की शाखाएं खोले जाए । ५ प्राय देखा गया है लोग छोटे छोटे विवाद पर आदलत का रूख कर लेते है। जिसका समाधान मूविंग अदालत ( जिसको एक जिले के हर विलेज में एक सप्ताह के लिए रुके ओर समाधान करे ) के द्वारा हो सकता है ।
Ghoghari Hetalkumar
Ghoghari Hetalkumar 5 years 3 months ago
e courts is very important in this pandemic time. we will save lot of time, government saurces,human hours and it will help us to make law and order sound.easy and fast justis system is very important for India. thanks
ABHAY KUMAR
ABHAY KUMAR 5 years 3 months ago
ना तो पूर्ण रूप से सरकारी ना तो private entities उचित है देश के लिए। देश चलाने के लिए सही लोगों का चुनाव आवश्यक है, हज़ारों लोग हैं जो अब Self Realisation के स्तर पर पहुँच चुके हैं उनका सदुपयोग करें जैसे दीपक पारिख, रतन टाटा, श्रीधरण, जयंत सिन्हा, सोनू सूद etc etc etc ईमानदार लोगों की कमी नहीं बस खोजने की काला चाहिए
JN RAJU
JN RAJU 5 years 3 months ago
sir, justice need shd be classified. poor middle class. rich. justice shd be rendered fast without much expenses by poor. middle class also in similar fashion. rich people cases shd be dealt with feeses. spl courts shd be dealt.That spl court expenses shd be distributed to. both clients. chronologically cases shd be dealt. process of trials complition by one judge and judgements by another judge or the same judge. speedy judgements with justice r critiria. Misuse shd not be there Thinkover
mahesh biyani
mahesh biyani 5 years 3 months ago
Time to bring a price control MSP on all vakils ! Like drugs ! any payment must be GST ! when all professionals pay GST, y shud lawyers be exempted ! & the earnings of all the lawyers be made public on dash board like annual reports & directors cards with number of cases handled . If CA firms have limits of audits, Y not audit firms? Pai pai ka hisab truth, transparency must begin fm The Tughlaq collegium Pillar but alas India is shariah gandy marji gandy rule - no problem make it official