GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
English language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

Start Date :
Jul 10, 2018
Last Date :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

Reset
Showing 1285 Submission(s)
Sukanta Ray
Sukanta Ray 8 years 5 days ago
New issue - on Section 66(1) "the credit availed is not within the normal limits" - what is meant by "normal limits"? A definition/ explanation need to be be inserted.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
SRINATH K
SRINATH K 8 years 5 days ago
dear Sir, Please avoid updation of website during return period . Make returns as simple as VAT 100 ( Karnataka State ) and provide proper offline tool where we can compare our books data with GSTR2A Data,Presently we are not able to export the GSTR2A Data to Excel for further Comparison,Better if supplier name is provided in gstr2A Data,Please do needful.
mygov_153158213153051741
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sukanta Ray
Sukanta Ray 8 years 5 days ago
New issue - on Audit (s. 65) and Special audit (s. 66) No time bars seem to have been prescribed for conducting audit or special audit.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sukanta Ray
Sukanta Ray 8 years 5 days ago
Observation on point at Serial No. 15 - Sec. 16(2)(b) -Explanation. If the second consignee is also ' a registered person' and he also gives direction to deliver it to a 3rd consignee - who will be deemed to be the actual recipient then?
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
sanjay bhan
sanjay bhan 8 years 5 days ago
My humble Request is to provide some relief to Financial consultants ifas who are doing tremendous joy by helping investor to attain their financial goals. Gst of 18% on Ifas is too much for them. If we calculated 18% plus 33% tax plus indirect taxes very difficult to survive and carry his businesses. May i request gst council to look into it and reduce our gst to minimum slab possible. Ours is a proffission which works at grass root of the society. We hope and expect a very positive respons
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
S Kannan
S Kannan 8 years 5 days ago
We welcome different GSTIN for different verdict under GST. The Reason for need of different verdict for a person is that under VAT particularly under TNVAT more than one thousand Transporters registered for business purpose, bring more consignments from Delhi different consignors for different consignees at Tamil nadu under their TNVAT till delivery to consignees door steps and dare the bills with the support of Tamil NAdu CT officials,TN faces thousand and thousand crores Revenue loss.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Karnik Kothari
Karnik Kothari 8 years 5 days ago
I respectfully demands further amendment in Section 35(5) and Section 44(2). The word “audited by a chartered accountant and cost accountant and other records and shall submit a copy of the audited” shall be deleted and will be substituted as “Examined by a GST Practitioners” and other record and other records and shall submit a copy of the verified annual accounts,” In section 44 and sub section (2) the word “audited” shall be replaced by “examined”.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sukanta Ray
Sukanta Ray 8 years 5 days ago
New issue - on refund voucher As per sec. 31(3)(e) - A 'refund voucher' is to be issued where no supply is made against a 'Receipt voucher' issued earlier. Which document (Voucher) is to be issued then, in case a receipt voucher was issued and subsequently only part supply has been made?
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Jatin bhatt
Jatin bhatt 8 years 5 days ago
" we Request the following amendment After the words cost accountant “ or a GSTP having 5 years of experience (as STP) and passed the examination conducted by NASIN and shall submit a copy of audited annual accounts......"
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Jatin bhatt
Jatin bhatt 8 years 5 days ago
" we Request the following amendment After the words cost accountant “ or a GSTP having 5 years of experience (as STP) and passed the examination conducted by NASIN and shall submit a copy of audited annual accounts......"
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sticky Menu