GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
English language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

Start Date :
Jul 10, 2018
Last Date :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

Reset
Showing 1285 Submission(s)
S Kannan
S Kannan 8 years 1 week ago
IMMEDIATE STEPS NEED TOSTOP BILL TRADING ACTIVITIES AND INTERSTATE MOVEMENT WITHOUT BILLS/ UNDER VALUE.SINCE VAT IMPLEMENTED IN TAMIL NADU, WITH THE COLLUSION OF TN COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICIALS SUPPORT TRANSPORTING PARTICULARILY PLYWOODS, CERAMIC TILES,ELECTRICALS GOODS FROM OTHER STATES WITHOUT BILLS AND BY HUNDREDS OF BILL TRADERS AND EVADED MORE THAN THOUSAND AND THOUSAND CRORES OF GOVERNMENT REVENUE. FACILIATE IGST - STATE WISE DAILY REVENUE INTHE GST PORTAL TO MONITORE STATE TO STATETRANSPORT
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
kanukollu associates
kanukollu associates 8 years 1 week ago
According to my view GST is a good system. but the government failed in implementation level.These are the recommendations form my side. 1.Provide the revised option for GSTR-3B. 2.Simplify the return process. 3.please give one more chance(TRAN-1) to claim refund of VAT input balances. 4.Simplify the GSTR-2A process it takes too much time too generate a file. 5.abolish the late fess up to one year
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
AMAR PAUL
AMAR PAUL 8 years 1 week ago
Dear Sir, We humbly demands further amendment in Section 35(5) and Section 44(2). The word “audited by a chartered accountant and cost accountant and other records and shall submit a copy of the audited” shall be deleted and will be substituted as “Examined by a GST Practitioners” and other record and other records and shall submit a copy of the verified annual accounts,” In section 44 and sub section (2) the word “audited” shall be replaced by “examined”.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
SUNIL KHUNTI
SUNIL KHUNTI 8 years 1 week ago
In case of refund of unutilized input tax credit arising due to exports (zero rated supplies), presently CGST Rules provide for calculation of refund for each tax period, i.e. on monthly basis. This creates difficulty to exporters as they are not able to obtain refund of unutilized credit.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
Hemant Rai
Hemant Rai 8 years 1 week ago
Dear Sir, We humbly demands further amendment in Section 35(5) and Section 44(2). The word “audited by a chartered accountant and cost accountant and other records and shall submit a copy of the audited” shall be deleted and will be substituted as “Examined by a GST Practitioners” and other record and other records and shall submit a copy of the verified annual accounts,” In section 44 and sub section (2) the word “audited” shall be replaced by “examined”.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
SUNIL KHUNTI
SUNIL KHUNTI 8 years 1 week ago
(1) Proposed amendment is appreciated. However presently in GSTR- 1, taxpayers are required to provide details of original tax invoice against which credit note or debit note is issued. Consequential amendment should be made in CGST Rules to accept details of consolidated credit note or debit note issued on basis of multiple tax invoices.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
BHASKAR B
BHASKAR B 8 years 1 week ago
DEAR SIR EVEN AFTER COMPLETION OF ONE YEAR, SO MANY DEALERS ARE CONFUSED ABOUT THE GST RETURNS FILING, AND FILING OF GSTR -3B AND GSTR-1 ON DIFFERENT DUE DATES, PLEASE MAKE SINGLE RETURN BY INCORPORATING ALL THE PROVISIONS OF UPLOADING AND PAYMENT OF TAXES. PLEASE DO NOT INITIATE RCM ON THE SMALL DEALER WITH A TURNOVER GAP OF 1-2 CR. IT WILL CREATE BURDEN ON THE SMALL DEALERS WITH WORKING CAPITAL BLOCK. MAKE THE REVISED OPTION FOR GST RETURNS WITH PAYMENT OF PENALTY OR INT ON THE TAX DUE
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
S Kannan
S Kannan 8 years 1 week ago
Amendment need under GST for Selling movable goods with COUNTERFIT MARK USED BY OANY OTHER PERSON. For example At Coimbatore and Chennai A dealer purchased huge volume of Plywood from Kerala And Import transporting Without bills and by HIS MANY BILL TRADERS WITH HELP OF TAMIL NADU COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICIALS SINCE VAT, SELLING COUNTERFEIT BRAND ' GREEN PLY' AND EVADEING CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS TAXES MORE THAN 100 CRORES. URGENT STEPS NEED,PROTECT END CONSUMERS MONEY AND GOVENMENT TAX REVENUE .
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sticky Menu