GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
English language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

Start Date :
Jul 10, 2018
Last Date :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

Reset
Showing 1285 Submission(s)
GOUTAM BAID
GOUTAM BAID 8 years 3 weeks ago
Section 23 and 24-There needs to be a clarity whether provisions of section 23 overrides 24 or vice-versa. At present Section 24 starts with following words-"Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 22" and Section 23 starts with following words- "(1) The following persons shall not be liable to registration, namely:––". This is creating a lot of ambiguity. Amend Section 23 to provide: "Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 22 and 24.."
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
GOUTAM BAID
GOUTAM BAID 8 years 3 weeks ago
Scope of the supply is an inclusive scope which is creating ambiguity. Section 7 starts with the words which are as follows: 7. (1) For the purposes of this Act,the expression “supply” includes– Either make scope of Supply to an exhaustive scope i.e. 7. (1) For the purposes of this Act,the expression “supply” means– or Insert an explanation that activities of personal nature i.e. Interest or rent would not be covered in scope of supply. So there is no ambiguity left
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Gopalakrishna
Gopalakrishna 8 years 3 weeks ago
1. Please standardise the HSN code to 4 or 6 digit to all tax payers. Now there is flexibility to opt 2 digit, 4 digit, 6 digit and 8 digit based on Turnover which is so complicated. 2. Simplify the Credit Note and Debit note formalities which is now based on Original Invoice reference. If we issue 1000 invoices we have to 1000 CN/DN which is very cumbersome activity.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
SUNIL MOTIRAM PAWAR
SUNIL MOTIRAM PAWAR 8 years 3 weeks ago
in my view following amendments should be incorporate in gst 1. there should be no late fees for late nil returns 2. Remark option should be given in every returns to fill comments in case of any mistakes or lapses which should be recorded and communicated to gstn portal
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Rohit Rathore
Rohit Rathore 8 years 3 weeks ago
Government increasing composition turnover limit but not reducing tax rate for Traders...... I think govt. Has to reduce turnover tax rate for trader to .50 %.Means CGST .25 % and SGST .25% This will reduce the tax burden on small delars . Because they are paying all taxes on purchase it self means CGST SGST IGST . This tax the delar has to pay from its pocket.. Reducing the tax rate will result positive increase in tax collection.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
chidagani venkatanarasimharao
chidagani venkatanarasimharao 8 years 3 weeks ago
still now no changes in market. manufacturing and sales and purchase every thing is normal GST Results is only 10% changes we have to change 100% changes in market what to do for 100% results only solution is 100% monitaring
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Kuldip Singh
Kuldip Singh 8 years 3 weeks ago
#AmendmentSrNo10 Sometimes Sr Advocates/Advocate firms ask advice on behalf of their client firms from experts who are not advocates. The invoices for these are raised by the experts on the Sr. Advocates/Advocate firms and in turn become part of their invoice to the client on which GST is charged under RCM. Charging GST on such invoices by the experts on advocates results in double tax on the same amount as well as tax on tax. Please clarify that GST on these is not chargeable.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Bhupesh Jain
Bhupesh Jain 8 years 3 weeks ago
जीएसटी सरलीकरण विनम्र आग्रह :- 1.GSTR-3Bसमाप्त करें। 2.एक ही बार में समस्त जानकारी दे सके ऐसा एक त्रैमासिक रिटर्न विकसित करें 3.सभी प्रकार का RCM समाप्त करें 4.रिफंड स्वचलित हो 5.बिक्री की विगत Dealer to Dealer हो 6.अब तक की लेटफीस माफ कर लौटाई जाए। 7.आगे प्रक्रिया जटिल ना हो।
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sourav Bhattacherjee
Sourav Bhattacherjee 8 years 3 weeks ago
Respected Sir Please reopen opt composition scheme window, KIndly give an option to revise the GSTR 1 & GSTR 3B, payment head transfer fees to tax column
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Sticky Menu