भारत सरकार
हिन्दी language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
ऐक्सेसिबिलिटी टूल
कलर एडजस्टमेंट
टेक्स्ट साइज़
नेविगेशन एडजस्टमेंट
Screen Reader iconस्क्रीन-रीडर्स
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

आरंभ करने की तिथि :
Jul 10, 2018
अंतिम तिथि :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
प्रस्तुतियाँ समाप्त हो चुके

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

फिर से कायम कर देना
1285 सबमिशन दिखा रहा है
Shivakumar Hillemane
Shivakumar Hillemane 8 साल 1 week पहले
#AmendmentSrNo33 The formula prescribed under Rule 89(4) is forcing traders to stop valuable forex earning business where they supply car only on export basis since 22% Cess being non refundable adds to cost of export making it unviable. Pls. enable claiming ITC refund of GST and Compensation Cess on specific identification method, even in cases where merchant export notification 40/2017-CT is not opted.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI 8 साल 1 week पहले
RESTAURANT SERVICE With effect from 14 October 2017 ITC facility from the restaurant service provider has been withdrawn with condition of charging 5% GST except the restaurant running under hotel which has declared tariff more than 7500/- Big restaurants have other expenses like royalty, chef, performers etc, security, manpower etc and pay GST on this expenses. The ITC facility to the restaurant should be reinstate.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI 8 साल 1 week पहले
Cab service/transport service Few of the service provider charge 12% with ITC facility and 5% without ITC facility. As a service recipient it is unnecessarily increasing the cost of the service @ 7% because GST ITC is ineligible. For the benefit of one industry why another industry is compromised.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Shivakumar Hillemane
Shivakumar Hillemane 8 साल 1 week पहले
#AmendmentSrNo11 Composition scheme shall be available to dealers having upto 25% service atleast to really benefit the self employed in the trading community at large. These one man businesses have to really toil hard to keep up with all GST compliances losing focus on their main revenue activity
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
NIMESH
NIMESH 8 साल 1 week पहले
I have only one suggestion, that while adding money to GST wallet, taxpayers shall add money only in a single account as "GST WALLET" and then at the time of offset, he can adjust the amount to "CGST/IGST/SGST TAX/interest/fee" etc. Rather the current system where taxpayers have to initially decide the account on which the amount needs to be deposited.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI 8 साल 1 week पहले
ITC ISSUE: The hotel industry or the industry who provide services related to immovable property charge GST based on the location of their property from the client, which is located outside the State, where the hotel is located. Due to such place of supply provision maximum part of GST credit unaccounted for the benefit of end user. This provision should be withdrawn and remove this ambiguity
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Sticky Menu