भारत सरकार
हिन्दी language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
ऐक्सेसिबिलिटी टूल
कलर एडजस्टमेंट
टेक्स्ट साइज़
नेविगेशन एडजस्टमेंट
Screen Reader iconस्क्रीन-रीडर्स
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

आरंभ करने की तिथि :
Jul 10, 2018
अंतिम तिथि :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
प्रस्तुतियाँ समाप्त हो चुके

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

फिर से कायम कर देना
1285 सबमिशन दिखा रहा है
RITESH GUPTA
RITESH GUPTA 8 साल 2 सप्ताह पहले
Sir, problem is arising with all MRP based products where MRP are inclusive of GST.For eg in medicines and other consumer goods same MRP is charged by all shopkeepers.Registered persons are selling these products at MRP and are paying GST by deducting the GST amount from MRP. Further, Unregistered and Composition Dealers are also selling these products at MRP but no taxes are paid by Unregistered Dealers and 1% tax is paid by Composition Dealers.In short profit% is less for registered persons.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
RAJEEV KUMAR DAMANI
RAJEEV KUMAR DAMANI 8 साल 2 सप्ताह पहले
1. in our country with a massive population, GST must have divisions such as manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer. This would not break the chain of suppliers and would give business to everyone as we must mot forget everyone cannot be a manufacturer. 2. Online trading platforms are playing a havoc to every individual with small to big investments. Sir, they must be stopped immediately. These are also eating away sales of millions of people with small and big establishments. Thank you
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
टिप्पणियाँ (1)
Dinesh Kapur
Dinesh Kapur 8 साल 2 सप्ताह पहले
Have following suggestions: 1. GST Help Line response is inadequate. Recently when I wrote for a clarification on Intra-State query, I was advised to go visit commissioner's office. 2. Refund system is inappropriate. Most of the consultants have still been unable to file applications for one reason or the other. Please simplify this. 3.Refund authorities should have a mechanism where they are able to satisfy their requirements by the mention of Shipping Bill No. by assessee
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Yogananda SK
Yogananda SK 8 साल 2 सप्ताह पहले
We are an 100% EOU and paying GST at the time of procurement of goods. But, in GST Circular No.14/14/2017-GST dt: 06.11.2017 where in the supplier can issue the goods against Form-A but in-turn he has to pay the GST up-front and to claim the refund from the dept. by considering it as deemed export. In this case,the obligation with supplier is a burden to shell out the cash up-front and go for refund. Why can't the old procedure of CT3 can be followed in GST also, Request to bring these changes
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Sticky Menu